Making a world building game during these times
Hello folks,
First off I want to thank everyone who downloaded this game from the Bundle for Racial Justice and Equality. As a hobbyist creator who saw their download count increase 1000 fold it was pretty overwhelming and I appreciate the opportunity to be part of something like that. That said, my little projects were never the focus of that bundle and there are still tons of bail funds and other sorts of crowd funding endeavors that need support out there. If you have the means, please consider sending some money there way. I recommend the Black Hills Bail and Legal Defense Fund. I also urge you to support and get involve with your local prison industrial complex (PIC) and military abolition movements, and in general be anti-capitalist as capitalism is the influence of all modern problems.
So what I wanted to discuss today was making about world-building in our current, y'know, "situation."
In the passed few weeks since the bundle, I have felt motivated to work on Our Pantheon. I am not super happy with the version that is out there and have been working on an update off and on for a few months. Since this game is all about creating a fantastical fictional world you may think that the game's design is not influenced too heavily by our own, but that couldn't be further from the truth. While I do draw on stuff from mythology, fantasy, sci-fi, etc, you cannot mistake the influence of real world events had on those things and on this game.
In the current in-development version of Our Pantheon, there is a "Chaos card" mechanic which replaces the dice tables of the currently released version. These card have various events on them that allow players to define some things they may not have otherwise thought of. However, there are some topics that I'm erring on the side of a caution about. For example, there probably should be a card about a pandemic considering how historically significant pandemics have been, but do I really want to write one? Do players really want to have that experience right now? Similarly, I could (probably should?) have cards about protests, riots, abuse of authority, colonization, etc, but as of this moment I do not. (There is one about revolution, but I feel that's currently in a more positive light.)
Now players could always just ban cards they are uncomfortable with from play, and that is already part of the rules anyway. But I wonder what is more responsible of me as the designer toward player safety? I trust players to be mature enough to deal with tough issues, but I wonder if that is enough. I think the framing of such events would be important. Each Chaos card has a series of suggested questions. These questions are often very intentionally leading. Things like "Which deity is accidentally responsible and why?" and "How is it discovered that they are immortal?" Maybe that is the answer here. If the questions help nudge players to frame things a certain way. That way they get stuff like "the riots lead to the emperor dead in their throne room and the establishment of an anarchist collective" instead of "the authorities put down the riot and murdered all the rioters." Though maybe I'm overthinking things.
Thank you for reading and what are your thoughts on the matter?
Get Our Pantheon
Our Pantheon
A GMless TTRPG about gods creating a world and the people in it
Status | In development |
Category | Physical game |
Author | D. W. O'Boyle |
Genre | Role Playing |
Tags | Creative, Dice, Fantasy, GM-Less, mythology, Tabletop, Turn-based, world-building |
Languages | English |
More posts
- Our Pantheon: Legends v2021.11 - minor updateNov 30, 2021
- Our Pantheon: Legends v2021.11 - RELEASEDNov 25, 2021
- Solo Play rule set (2021.10)Oct 22, 2021
- Our Pantheon: Legends v2021.10 - RELEASEDOct 03, 2021
- A small announcementMay 20, 2020
- Alpha v2.1 Released!Jan 18, 2020
- Version ArchiveJan 18, 2020
- Next Update will be out next week!Jan 15, 2020
- What's next for Our PantheonDec 31, 2019
Comments
Log in with itch.io to leave a comment.
Okay, so I'm 7 months late, and I hope this hasn't been eating you up the whole time. That said, since you only got one response, I figured I should give my thoughts too.
Framing the questions is wise, but part of being a creator is recognizing that some things are out of your hands. Beyond a certain point, you just have to sit back and let the community react. Caring too much about what everyone else wants leads to a toxic cycle of self-hate, where a project is never good enough.
You can't please everyone.
That doesn't absolve you of the responsibility to not be an asshole, but it does alleviate some of the stress of creation.
I think you've already done enough by including a phase of the game where players go over the game and have the Yes, No, and Veil section. That's already a genius move and having that phase absolves a lot of the targeting towards you. After that point, add cards that match your own sensibilities, and expect people to take them out or add more ones as they match their own groups' sensibilities.
I have been gaming since 1978. I have found dealing with dark topics in-game have made me more aware of "reality" and what coping mechanisms are best employed to dealwith them. Personally, I would have my kids face a sensitive topic in play and learn ways to cope, rather than get surprised by a real-life slap-in-the-face. Watering down a great lesson/scenario is like mixing a shot of whiskey in a bucket of water. You know it's in there but you cannot taste it and it will not have its desired effect. Perhaps put a warning label on the product and let the GM/Players decide.